Digestly

Apr 29, 2025

Progressive cities are shrinking

Big Think - Progressive cities are shrinking

The study of California housing reveals a correlation between increased progressive vote share and a decline in housing permits. Specifically, for every 10% increase in progressive vote share, housing permits decrease by 30%. This trend is alarming as it suggests that more progressive cities are experiencing a reduction in housing supply, contrary to expectations. Additionally, major Democratic states like New York, California, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington are experiencing population losses. This is attributed to the high cost of living and affordability issues, leading to people moving away. The phenomenon of 'voting with your feet' indicates that people are leaving liberal-governed areas, which is seen as a significant critique of the liberal movement in the U.S.

Key Points:

  • 10% increase in progressive vote share leads to 30% decline in housing permits.
  • Major Democratic states are losing population due to affordability issues.
  • 'Voting with your feet' indicates dissatisfaction with liberal governance.
  • Population loss in states like New York, California, and Illinois.
  • The trend is a critique of the liberal movement's impact on housing and affordability.

Details:

1. πŸ“‰ Progressive Voting and Housing Decline

  • Research indicates that in California, for every 10% increase in the progressive vote share within a city, there is a corresponding decline in the number of housing permits issued.
  • This trend highlights a significant relationship between political ideology and housing policy, particularly in progressive regions where environmental and regulatory concerns may be prioritized over housing expansion.
  • For example, cities with higher progressive voting patterns tend to implement stricter zoning laws, which can lead to a reduction in new housing developments.
  • This has broader implications for housing affordability and availability, particularly in high-demand urban areas.

2. πŸ™οΈ The Progressive Paradox in City Development

  • As cities adopt more progressive policies, there is a notable 30% decline in housing supply, highlighting a significant challenge in balancing policy intentions with practical outcomes.
  • The decline in housing supply is attributed to strict zoning laws and the prioritization of environmental and aesthetic considerations over expansion and development.
  • This trend underscores the need for cities to reconcile progressive values with effective housing strategies to accommodate growing populations.
  • Examining case studies of cities like San Francisco and Seattle reveals that while progressive policies aim to promote inclusive growth, they often inadvertently restrict housing availability, leading to increased rent prices and affordability issues.
  • To counteract these effects, cities could implement flexible zoning regulations and encourage mixed-use developments to increase housing stock without compromising progressive ideals.

3. 🌍 Population Loss in Democrat-Governed States

  • Democrat-governed states including New York, California, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington are experiencing population losses.
  • The population decline is attributed to factors such as high cost of living, taxation policies, and business climate challenges.
  • These states are seeing an outflow of residents seeking more affordable living conditions and favorable economic environments elsewhere.
  • The impact of this population loss includes reduced tax revenue, potential labor shortages, and shifts in political representation.
  • Addressing these challenges requires strategic policy adjustments to improve affordability and attract residents and businesses.

4. πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈ Voting with Feet: The Middle-Class Exodus

  • Democrats are facing losses in both elections and population due to affordability issues, which is causing middle and working-class individuals to relocate.
  • The act of 'voting with feet' is a more significant statement than casting a ballot, as it involves substantial personal cost and indicates strong dissatisfaction with current governance.
  • This exodus is a critical indicator of the challenges facing the liberal movement, as it suggests dissatisfaction with liberal governance models, particularly in terms of economic policies and cost of living.
  • Concrete examples include people moving from high-cost, liberal-governed states like California and New York to more affordable, conservative states, highlighting a significant demographic and political shift.
  • Metrics show that states like Texas and Florida are experiencing population growth, while states like California are seeing a decline, underscoring the impact of economic policies on migration patterns.
View Full Content
Upgrade to Plus to unlock complete episodes, key insights, and in-depth analysis
Starting at $5/month. Cancel anytime.