Leeja Miller - Can The Courts Stop Trump?
Following Trump's inauguration, he issued numerous executive orders to quickly implement his campaign promises, aligning with the Project 2025 Playbook. These actions have led to a series of lawsuits aimed at halting these orders, which are seen as threats to civil rights and liberties. The courts, despite being filled with Trump appointees, are viewed as the last line of defense against these potentially unconstitutional actions. Key lawsuits include challenges to the reinstatement of Schedule F employees, the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency, and the order to end birthright citizenship. The video highlights the importance of legal challenges in protecting rights and the role of organizations like the ACLU in these efforts. Additionally, it discusses the expansion of expedited removal by the Department of Homeland Security, which threatens due process rights for immigrants. The video emphasizes the need for vigilance and activism to counter these executive actions and protect civil liberties.
Key Points:
- Trump issued numerous executive orders post-inauguration, sparking legal challenges.
- Lawsuits target orders like ending birthright citizenship and reinstating Schedule F employees.
- The courts, despite Trump appointees, are crucial in challenging these actions.
- Organizations like the ACLU are actively filing lawsuits to protect civil rights.
- The expansion of expedited removal threatens due process for immigrants.
Details:
1. 📜 Trump's Executive Orders & Campaign Promises
- Shortly after his inauguration, Trump issued multiple presidential orders and proclamations aimed at quickly fulfilling his campaign promises.
- These actions are strategically aligned with the Project 2025 Playbook, which provides a structured approach to translating campaign commitments into executive actions.
- Examples of these executive orders include the withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the initiation of the construction of the border wall, demonstrating his focus on trade and immigration policies.
- The Project 2025 Playbook serves as a blueprint, outlining steps for implementing policy changes consistent with Trump's pre-election agenda.
2. ⚖️ Legal Responses to Trump's Orders
- Numerous lawsuits have been filed to halt Trump's orders, aiming to protect the rights of millions, including government workers and immigrants.
- Specific examples include challenges to immigration policies that affected travel for citizens from certain countries, leading to temporary stays and injunctions by federal judges.
- Legal actions have also targeted orders impacting federal employees, focusing on labor and employment rights, with some cases reaching appellate courts for further review.
- These lawsuits highlight a strategic legal approach to counter executive actions perceived as overreaching, emphasizing checks and balances in government.
3. 🚧 Courts as Guardians of Civil Liberties
- Courts are seen as the final barrier against illegal actions by the administration aimed at rolling back civil rights and liberties.
- The judiciary's effectiveness is questioned due to the presence of Trump appointees, including at the Supreme Court level.
- Recent cases, such as [specific case examples], highlight the judiciary's role in defending civil liberties.
- Trump appointees have influenced decisions, with [specific examples] showing shifts in legal interpretations.
- Despite challenges, courts have upheld significant civil liberties such as [example of specific rights upheld].
4. 🍽️ Cook Unity: Convenient Gourmet Meals
- Cook Unity is a chef-to-table platform that delivers restaurant-quality meals to your doorstep, created by over 90 chefs from top restaurants across the country.
- The service prioritizes using fresh, responsibly sourced ingredients, focusing on whole foods and local suppliers.
- The platform provides convenience, especially appealing to those who dislike cooking or prefer not to leave home due to weather conditions.
- Cook Unity offers a diverse range of meals from around the world, allowing customers to enjoy international cuisine prepared by experienced chefs.
- A specific example includes a meal of chicken in mole poblano with rice, corn, and glazed brussel sprouts from Chef Jose Gares, highlighting the variety and quality of meals offered.
- Customers can try Cook Unity with a 50% discount on their first order by using a specific link and code, providing an affordable opportunity to experience gourmet meals at home.
5. 🔍 Tracking Trump Administration's Actions
- Democracy Forward has developed a user-friendly dashboard for real-time analysis of Trump Administration actions.
- The National Treasury Employees Union has filed a lawsuit on behalf of unionized employees in 37 federal agencies against the reinstatement of Schedule F employees.
- Schedule F, created by Trump at the end of his first term and reversed by Biden, removes due process protections for thousands of government employees, allowing dismissal at will.
- The lawsuit claims that the order violates congressional laws, the intent for federal employee rights, and Office of Personnel Management regulations, constituting an overreach of executive power.
- The lawsuit was filed on January 20th, with expectations of more lawsuits to follow from other unions representing federal employees.
6. 📈 Lawsuits Targeting New Federal Departments
6.1. Introduction to Legal Challenges
6.2. Details and Allegations
7. 🍼 Birthright Citizenship Legal Battles
- Trump's order to end Birthright citizenship for babies born to undocumented or temporary parents sparked significant litigation.
- Attorneys General in 22 states, along with the ACLU and other immigrant rights groups, filed lawsuits against the order.
- A total of at least five separate lawsuits were filed almost immediately after the order's announcement.
- Multiple Attorneys General and legal experts argue that Trump lacks the Constitutional authority to revoke Birthright citizenship, which has been established for 150 years and upheld by the Supreme Court twice.
- A Reagan-appointed judge temporarily barred the Birthright citizenship order from taking effect, labeling it as 'blatantly unconstitutional.'
- The judge expressed incredulity towards the government's attorney over the constitutionality of the order, highlighting a strong legal consensus against it.
8. ⚖️ Court Precedents & Judicial Reactions
- A temporary injunction issued by a judge lasts until February 6th, serving as an immediate protective measure with a scheduled preliminary injunction hearing to follow.
- If a preliminary injunction is granted, it will delay the implementation of an order pending a constitutional review, highlighting the judiciary's role in balancing immediate legal concerns with long-term constitutional considerations.
- Immediate appeals to the Supreme Court are anticipated regarding both the injunction and any lower court rulings on constitutionality, suggesting a proactive judicial approach to maintaining legal stability.
- The Supreme Court's decision could have significant implications for the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, raising concerns about the potential overturning of established rights and the broader impact on legal precedents.
9. 📜 Civil Rights Historical Context & Reinterpretation
- The Supreme Court is unlikely to reverse long-standing precedents concerning birthright citizenship, emphasizing historical and traditional interpretations.
- The case United States versus Wong Kim Arc (1898) set a critical precedent confirming birthright citizenship for individuals born to immigrants, even amidst anti-Chinese sentiment.
- Exceptions to birthright citizenship include children of foreign diplomats and enemy combatants occupying U.S. territory illegally during wartime.
- Some argue illegal immigrants could be seen as 'enemies within,' but historical context and legal precedents challenge this view.
- A Trump-appointed judge suggested immigrants at the southern border could be seen as an 'invasion,' aligning with certain Republican narratives.
- No Supreme Court precedent supports altering the 14th Amendment to exclude birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants.
- Fringe arguments against birthright citizenship have emerged, connected to figures involved in controversial legal actions following the 2020 election.
10. ⚖️ Controversial Rollback of Civil Rights Protections
- The Dred Scott v. Sanford decision held that people of African ancestry born in the US were not citizens, a ruling that contributed to the onset of the Civil War.
- The 14th Amendment was enacted to explicitly grant citizenship to all individuals born in the US, correcting the injustices of the Dred Scott decision and ensuring equal rights.
- Recent legal interpretations claim that the 14th Amendment's application was limited to rectifying the Dred Scott decision, which is viewed as a historical misinterpretation.
- These interpretations threaten to undermine civil rights advancements, potentially benefiting wealthy individuals by restricting broader civil rights protections.
11. 🚫 Merit-Based Opportunities vs. Discrimination
11.1. Content of Trump's Executive Order
11.2. Implications and Critique
12. 🚨 DOJ's Civil Rights Division Halts
- Studies reveal ongoing racism in hiring practices, with candidates having black-sounding names receiving fewer interview offers compared to others, and black candidates with a clean record receiving fewer job offers than white candidates with a felony.
- Trump's rhetoric suggests that anti-discrimination laws favor non-white males, which ignores the systemic racism and historical context of discrimination faced by minorities.
- The suspension of activities in the Civil Rights divisions across every US attorney's office affects hundreds of federal attorneys and thousands of cases related to civil rights enforcement.
- While civil rights laws remain on the books, their enforcement is hindered due to the DOJ's halted activities, impacting the protection against discrimination.
13. 🔍 Federal Agency Directives & Expedited Removals
- Federal agencies are implementing new actions based on Trump's directives, leading to lawsuits with potential long-term impacts on federal and state agencies relying on federal funding.
- The Federal Register serves as a comprehensive resource to track daily federal agency actions, which can be overwhelming; focusing on specific causes or watchdog organizations can be more manageable.
- The ACLU and immigrant rights groups have initiated lawsuits against the Department of Homeland Security due to a directive expanding expedited removal nationwide.
- The expedited removal process allows DHS to quickly deport immigrants near the border who have been in the U.S. for fewer than 14 days without legal proceedings. The new rule expands this nationwide and affects those who cannot prove a two-year U.S. residency, potentially impacting millions without due process.
- Due process is a constitutional right, ensuring individuals receive notice and a hearing before a judge when facing detention or removal.
- Critics argue the expanded expedited removal process may lead to errors and racial profiling, citing past wrongful deportations, including of U.S. citizens.
- Reports, including a congressional study, have documented abuses and flaws in the expedited removal process, highlighting the risks of its nationwide expansion.
- Legal challenges are underway, aiming to protect the rights of millions potentially affected by these directives.
14. 🛡️ Legal Challenges as Beacons of Hope
14.1. Legal Readiness and Collective Action
14.2. Impact of Legal Actions
15. 🌱 Community Activism & Collective Resilience
- Focus your finite time on causes that matter to avoid being overwhelmed by information.
- Avoid doom scrolling and giving attention to apps run by billionaires, comparing them to gaining power like Voldemort.
- Prioritize personal skill and education improvement by engaging in activities like renting books, joining circles, or gardening.
- Engage with your local community, which likely contains many helpers you can collaborate with.
- Join the Y America co-learning lab on Patreon to participate in discussions and access a curated monthly syllabus.
- The current theme is 'Eat the Rich: Building Solidarity in the New Gilded Age,' focusing on learning from past movements.
- Encourages learning from history to anticipate future challenges, noting history's tendency to repeat itself.
- The community discussions are hosted on Patreon, providing a platform for building collective resilience.