ABC News - Trump sues judge and Manhattan DA over denial of president-elect’s immunity motions
Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan, aiming to delay his sentencing scheduled for Friday. Trump was set to be sentenced on 34 felony counts related to falsifying business records. His legal team argues that the judge exceeded his jurisdiction by denying Trump's claim of presidential immunity. The lawsuit is seen as a tactic to delay the sentencing, which could label Trump as a convicted felon just days before his inauguration. Trump's team is trying to leverage arguments related to presidential immunity, although these have been previously rejected by the judge. The district attorney insists that the sentencing should proceed as planned. Oral arguments for the lawsuit are scheduled for tomorrow, and the outcome could impact the scheduled sentencing.
Key Points:
- Trump's legal team is suing to delay sentencing on 34 felony counts.
- The lawsuit claims the judge exceeded jurisdiction by denying immunity.
- Sentencing delay aims to avoid Trump being labeled a felon before inauguration.
- District Attorney Bragg insists sentencing should proceed.
- Oral arguments for the lawsuit are scheduled for tomorrow.
Details:
1. 🎤 Capitol Hill Update
- The Capitol Hill update focuses on recent legislative developments and political dynamics.
- Key discussions include the budget negotiations, with emphasis on potential impacts on public services and government operations.
- There is an analysis of bipartisan efforts to address pressing issues like healthcare reform and infrastructure funding.
- The update highlights recent hearings and testimonies that could influence upcoming policy decisions.
- Attention is given to the strategic maneuvers by both parties in anticipation of the upcoming election cycle.
2. 📰 Breaking News: Trump Lawsuit
- President-elect Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against Manhattan, citing grievances related to property valuations and alleged unfair treatment.
- The lawsuit claims that Manhattan's tax assessments on Trump's properties are excessively high, impacting his financial interests.
- Trump's legal team argues that the tax assessments are politically motivated, seeking a reduction in assessed values to reflect what they claim are more accurate market conditions.
- If successful, the lawsuit could result in significant tax savings for Trump, potentially influencing future property tax assessments in the area.
- This legal action is part of a broader strategy by Trump to address what he perceives as systemic biases against him and his business operations.
3. ⚖️ Trump's Legal Battle
- District Attorney Alvin Bragg is leading a significant legal case against Trump, highlighting the complexities of presidential immunity.
- The denial of immunity motions for the President-elect is a central issue, raising questions about the extent of legal protections for current and former presidents.
- This legal battle is pivotal not only for Trump but also for setting precedents in presidential legal accountability.
- Details about the charges, legal strategies employed, and potential outcomes could provide deeper insights into the case's significance.
4. 📅 Sentencing Strategies and Legal Maneuvers
- The sentencing process is scheduled for Friday, providing a critical timeline for legal strategies.
- The individual faces 34 felony counts, specifically related to falsifying business records, highlighting the seriousness of the charges.
- Understanding the implications of these charges is crucial, as they can lead to significant legal consequences, including potential imprisonment.
- Legal teams must prepare to address both the charges and seek any possible mitigating circumstances that could influence the sentencing outcome.
- The outcome of the sentencing could have broader implications for similar cases, setting precedents for how such charges are handled in the future.
5. 🔍 Legal Delays and Tactics
- Donald Trump's legal team is actively employing tactics to delay his sentencing, originally scheduled for Friday, highlighting a strategic approach to extend legal proceedings.
- The team's strategy involves meticulous scrutiny of Judge Merchan's actions, aiming to find grounds for postponement.
- These tactics are part of a broader legal strategy to manage and potentially influence the trial's timeline, illustrating a common practice in high-profile cases to gain advantage.
6. 🚨 Jurisdiction Challenge
- The legal challenge claims that Judge Merchan exceeded his jurisdiction by denying the claim of presidential immunity, which is a significant legal argument as it questions the boundaries of judicial authority in cases involving a sitting president.
- A request has been made to halt the sentencing scheduled for Friday, indicating a strategic legal maneuver to delay proceedings and possibly reconsider the jurisdictional decision.
- The District Attorney (D.A.) has opposed this request, asserting that the sentencing should proceed as planned, emphasizing their confidence in the legal standing of the previous decision and the urgency of resolving the case without further delay.
7. 📅 Sentencing Debate and Lawsuit Details
7.1. Sentencing Hearing Details
7.2. Lawsuit Against Alvin Bragg and Judge
8. 🔄 Delay Tactics and Legal Arguments
8.1. Lawsuit Announcement and Immediate Proceedings
8.2. Delay Tactics by Trump's Legal Team
9. 🕒 Sentencing Timing and Political Implications
- The Trump legal team considers the discharge sentencing a victory, as it prevents immediate prison time for their client, Donald Trump.
- Their strategy includes filing lawsuits and employing delay tactics to avoid having Trump become a convicted felon before the possible start of his presidency on January 20th.
- The sentencing date set ten days prior to the inauguration is politically significant for Trump, highlighting the urgency of their legal maneuvers.
- By delaying sentencing until after the inauguration, the team aims to prevent Trump from having a felony record during his presidency, which would have substantial political repercussions.
10. 🏛️ Court Proceedings and Legal Rejections
10.1. Court Proceedings
10.2. Legal Strategies and Implications
11. 🔗 Legal Maneuverings and Strategic Efforts
- Alvin Bragg is actively opposing strategies to link current legal issues to presidential immunity, as a judge has ruled against these connections.
- The case notably involves attempts to apply Supreme Court arguments about presidential immunity concerning Trump's actions on January 6, which have been dismissed by the judge.
- Bragg encourages the continued dismissal of such arguments, although there is an acknowledgment that the opposition might have a potential case.
- A pattern of persistent motion filings and appeals is observed, frequently leading to denials, suggesting a deliberate strategy of legal persistence and delay.
- This ongoing legal strategy appears aimed at delaying proceedings, reflecting similar past efforts by Trump's legal team.
- Donald Trump is actively suing both the Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, and Judge Juan Merchan following the denial of his immunity motions, highlighting a combative legal approach.