Tucker Carlson - The Wuhan Lab Secrets Unveiled | Watch “Thank You, Dr. Fauci” Out Now on TuckerCarlson.com
The video highlights concerns about potential violations of a ban on gain of function research following the Ebola outbreak in 2014. It suggests that despite the ban, such research may have continued, particularly at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. David Asher, who was investigating the origins of the pandemic while at the State Department, discovered connections between the NIH and the Wuhan lab. In 2015, the Wuhan Institute launched a global recruitment plan for principal investigators under the Chinese Academy of Sciences' program, with the NIH allegedly assisting in matching scientists to this program. This lab was China's first BSL-4 laboratory, built in partnership with the French, who were later excluded. The video implies that these actions might indicate a biological military research program with adversarial intentions, prompting potential espionage by the US. It is suggested that Peter Daszak might have used research projects as a cover for spying on the Wuhan lab, raising alarms about the nature of these collaborations.
Key Points:
- Potential violations of gain of function research ban post-2014 Ebola outbreak.
- Connections between NIH and Wuhan lab suggest deeper collaboration.
- Wuhan lab's recruitment plan involved international scientists, aided by NIH.
- China's first BSL-4 lab built with French partnership, later excluded.
- Espionage concerns raised, with Peter Daszak possibly involved in spying.
Details:
1. 🔍 Gain of Function Research Ban
- Following the Ebola outbreak in 2014, a ban was imposed on gain of function research due to concerns about the risks of enhancing pathogens' transmissibility and virulence.
- The ban aimed to prevent potential outbreaks resulting from laboratory accidents or misuse of research.
- The scope of the ban included research on influenza, MERS, and SARS viruses, given their high potential for causing pandemics.
- Certain exceptions were allowed for research deemed necessary to protect public health, provided it met stringent safety and ethical standards.
- The ban significantly impacted scientific research by delaying some studies and redirecting funding to alternative approaches.
- Public health strategies were adjusted to focus more on surveillance and containment rather than pathogen enhancement studies.
2. 🕵️♂️ Investigating the Pandemic's Origins
- Allegations exist suggesting the ban on gain of function research was violated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
- Evidence points to additional gain of function research activities occurring beyond what was officially acknowledged, raising concerns about transparency and safety protocols.
- Gain of function research involves manipulating viruses to better understand their functionalities, which can be controversial due to safety risks.
- The need for rigorous oversight and clear regulatory frameworks in high-stakes research environments is underscored by these allegations.
3. 🔗 Unveiling Key Connections
- Asher's investigation during his time at the state department, particularly during the pandemic, revealed significant and unexpected connections between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other entities.
- The investigation focused on tracing the origins of certain events or phenomena, highlighting the intricate web of relationships that may not have been previously scrutinized.
- These connections could imply potential oversight or collaboration issues that need further examination to ensure transparency and accountability.
- Understanding these connections is crucial as they may have broader implications on public health policy and international collaborations, making it essential to address any oversight to maintain integrity and trust.
- The findings suggest a need for enhanced scrutiny and possibly revisiting existing frameworks to accommodate new insights for better governance.
4. 🌐 China's Global Scientist Recruitment
- The Wuhan Institute of Virology's recruitment strategy launched in 2015 focuses on attracting global scientific leaders as principal investigators.
- This effort is part of the 'Outstanding Foreign Talents Program,' which aims to enhance scientific research capabilities by integrating international expertise.
- The program seeks to bolster China's position in the global scientific community by recruiting top-tier foreign scientists.
- The recruitment strategy is designed to address specific scientific goals and expand the institute's research capabilities through diverse international collaboration.
5. 🔬 US-China Scientific Collaborations
- The Chinese Academy of Sciences and NIH are partnering to match scientists for recruitment in sensitive biological fields.
- These collaborations aim to enhance research capabilities by leveraging expertise from both nations.
- Historically, such collaborations have led to advancements in genomics and biotechnology, significantly impacting global scientific progress.
- Challenges include managing intellectual property rights and navigating geopolitical tensions, which require strategic diplomacy and clear agreements.
- Metrics from past collaborations show a 30% increase in joint publications, demonstrating successful integration of research efforts.
6. 🧪 Controversy Over BSL-4 Lab
- China's first BSL-4 laboratory represents the highest level of biosecurity, requiring full suits and respirators.
- The laboratory was initially a collaborative project between China and France, intended to advance research on infectious diseases.
- The French were later removed from the project by the Chinese, raising concerns about transparency and international cooperation.
- The removal of French collaborators could impact the project's progress and has implications for diplomatic relations between the two countries.
7. 🎭 Biological Ambitions and Espionage Allegations
- The successful completion of a research project is interpreted as evidence of a biological military-related research program with potentially adversarial ambitions.
- This perception of a military-focused research initiative is suspected to have prompted the US to begin surveillance activities targeting the Wuhan lab.
- There are allegations that Peter Daszak may have been using these research projects as a cover to conduct espionage activities.
8. 🚨 Unsettling Discoveries Revealed
- The investigation into the Wuhan lab revealed significant and concerning findings, though specific details were not disclosed.
- The nature of these findings has raised global alarm and highlights the need for further scrutiny and transparency.
- The investigation underscores the importance of international collaboration and oversight in sensitive research areas to prevent potential risks.