ABC News - What we know about Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the suspect in the New Orleans attack
Shamsu Den Jabar, the suspect in a recent investigation, served in the US Army from 2007 to 2015 in human resources and later as an IT specialist in the Army Reserve until 2020. He was deployed to Afghanistan from February 2009 to January 2010. Despite his military service, his roles were not combat-related. The FBI is investigating his background, including military service, and has suggested he may not have acted alone. The investigation is exploring his social footprint to determine if he was self-radicalized or had connections with others. The FBI has labeled the incident as an act of terrorism, indicating intent to cause harm or panic, but not necessarily foreign influence. Further details are expected as the investigation progresses.
Key Points:
- Shamsu Den Jabar served in non-combat roles in the US Army and Army Reserve from 2007 to 2020.
- The FBI is investigating his potential connections to others, suggesting he may not have acted alone.
- His social media and online activity are being scrutinized for signs of self-radicalization.
- The incident is classified as terrorism, focusing on intent to cause harm or panic.
- Further information is anticipated as the investigation continues.
Details:
1. 🪖 Suspect's Army Service Details
1.1. Army Service Confirmation
1.2. Implications of Army Service on Investigation
2. 🔍 Investigation Overview and FBI's Initial Findings
- Shamsu Den Jabar held human resources and IT roles in the Army (2007-2015) and as an IT specialist in the Army Reserve (2015-2020), providing a non-combat perspective during his service.
- His deployment to Afghanistan from February 2009 to January 2010 involved roles that were not direct combat positions, which is a focal point for investigators.
- Federal investigators are scrutinizing his HR and IT roles, focusing on any implications they may have on security protocols and data management.
- The investigation aims to uncover potential security breaches or unauthorized data access during his tenure.
3. 🌐 Suspect's Alleged Accomplices
3.1. FBI Statements on Investigation
3.2. Implications of FBI Findings
4. 🕵️♂️ Social Footprint and Terrorism Implications
- Authorities conduct a thorough analysis of the suspect's social footprint, examining online activities, search history, and video consumption to assess any signs of self-radicalization.
- Behavioral changes observed by family, friends, or co-workers prior to the attack are considered crucial in understanding the suspect's radicalization process.
- The FBI has classified the incident as an act of terrorism based on the suspect's intent to harm, incite panic, or coerce the government, emphasizing that this classification does not necessarily require foreign influence.
- Investigators employ advanced digital forensics to trace and interpret the suspect's online interactions and affiliations, providing insight into potential self-radicalization pathways.
- The ongoing investigation is expected to reveal further details, enhancing the understanding of the suspect's motivations and connections.