Tucker Carlson - COVID Scientists’ Slack Channel Exposed | Watch “Thank You, Dr. Fauci” Out Now on TuckerCarlson.com
The transcript reveals a debate among scientists on Slack about the possibility of a virus being engineered for human transmission, which some suspect could be linked to lab engineering. There was a heated discussion between scientists Anderson and Holes, who had concerns about unusual genome aspects, and gain-of-function biologists who argued their work couldn't cause a pandemic. The conversation hints at a 'big ask' during a call, though details are unclear. Anderson and Gary, scientists involved in the discussion, had a significant grant proposal for research on emerging infectious diseases in West Africa, valued at $8.9 million. This proposal was pending approval, suggesting a potential conflict of interest, as they might be incentivized to align their findings with the preferences of influential figures like Collins and Fauci, who oversee substantial research funding.
Key Points:
- Scientists debated if a virus was engineered for human transmission.
- Concerns were raised about unusual genome aspects and lab engineering.
- A 'big ask' was mentioned, but its details remain unknown.
- Anderson and Gary had a pending $8.9 million grant proposal.
- Influential figures like Collins and Fauci control significant research funding.
Details:
1. 🔍 Lab Engineering Suspicions: A Shouting Match
- There is a suspicion among the group on Slack that the virus was engineered for human transmission, particularly due to its characteristics that align with those expected from lab manipulation.
- The conversation highlights specific features of the virus such as its rapid human-to-human transmission and genetic markers that are atypical for natural viruses.
- Participants discuss potential motives for engineering such a virus, including bioweapon development and scientific experimentation.
- The group also considers alternative theories, such as zoonotic origins, but notes the lack of typical intermediary host evidence.
- Evidence cited includes genetic sequencing data and patterns of spread that suggest intentional modification rather than natural evolution.
- The discussion reflects a broader debate within the scientific community about the origins of the virus, with some members advocating for further investigation into lab-based scenarios.
2. 🧬 Genome Concerns and Gain of Function Debates
2.1. Suspicion and Unusual Genome Aspects
2.2. Gain of Function Research and Regulatory Needs
3. 🤔 The Big Ask and Unanswered Questions
- Gain of function biologists have historically claimed their work could not trigger a pandemic, yet skepticism remains about this assurance, highlighting the need for transparent risk assessment in such research.
- Internal communications (slacks) during discussions revealed a significant 'big ask,' a request whose details remain undisclosed, raising questions about the nature and implications of this request.
- The lack of disclosure about the 'big ask' contributes to ongoing uncertainties and challenges in understanding the full scope of decisions made in this context.
4. 💼 Influence of Funding on Scientific Discourse
- Funding agencies oversee about $72 billion annually, profoundly shaping scientific discourse.
- The financial influence compels scientists to align their research and publications with the interests of funding bodies.
- This dynamic can skew scientific inquiry towards topics favored by funders, potentially neglecting other important areas of research.
- For example, in recent years, significant funding has been directed towards climate change and renewable energy, leading to an increase in publications in these areas while possibly diverting attention from less funded fields.
5. 💰 Grant Proposals and Compliance Pressure
- Christian Anderson and Robert Gary submitted a large grant proposal for a center focused on emerging infectious diseases in West Africa.
- The grant proposal was valued at $8.9 million, highlighting significant financial stakes and compliance requirements.
- The proposal aims to establish a research center dedicated to understanding and combating infectious diseases, crucial for improving global health security.
- Emerging infectious diseases in West Africa present a critical challenge due to factors like climate change and urbanization, making this proposal strategically significant.
- The grant's success would facilitate collaborations with local governments and international health organizations, enhancing disease monitoring and response capabilities.