House Republicans have concluded their investigation into the January 6th attack, suggesting that former Representative Liz Cheney should be investigated by the FBI for alleged witness tampering. The claim centers around communications between Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson, a key witness in the hearings. Former U.S. attorney Harry Litman argues that there is no merit to these claims, as such communications are common in legal proceedings. Hutchinson initially had a lawyer paid by the Trump Organization, who advised her not to be forthcoming. After changing lawyers, she provided more detailed testimony. Litman suggests that the allegations against Cheney are unfounded and that no self-respecting prosecutor would pursue them. He also discusses the potential for political motivations behind these allegations, particularly if Trump loyalists gain influence in the DOJ. Despite the report's suggestion that the FBI should prosecute Cheney, Litman believes there is no legal basis for such action and that it is unlikely to succeed. However, he acknowledges that the process could create trouble and expenses for Cheney.