MSNBC - No 'tangible evidence' for Trump team to claim 'grave juror misconduct' in hush money case: Lawyer
The segment discusses the legal implications of juror misconduct in a case involving Donald Trump. Trump's attorneys claim they have evidence of juror misconduct, which they argue could be grounds for dismissing the case. However, the allegations are vague, and the New York District Attorney's office has called them inaccurate. Defense attorney Misty Maris explains that juror misconduct is serious and can lead to a conviction being overturned if it is material to the case. However, evidence of misconduct must be tangible and not speculative or hearsay. Currently, there is no sworn statement from the juror, which is necessary for the court to take action. The judge cannot decide on the claims based on conjecture, and without a sworn statement, the case cannot move forward on these grounds.
Key Points:
- Juror misconduct can overturn a conviction if proven with tangible evidence.
- Trump's attorneys claim juror misconduct but lack a sworn statement from the juror.
- The New York District Attorney's office finds the allegations vague and inaccurate.
- A sworn statement from the juror is necessary for the court to consider the claims.
- The judge cannot act on conjecture; tangible evidence is required to proceed.